The issue of the divine authenticity of Quranic revelation in terms of word and meaning has al-ways been one of the fundamental beliefs of Muslims. However, in the contemporary era, this belief has been met with doubts by some orientalists and religious thinkers regarding the human origin of the Quran. This research, using a descriptive-analytical method and a comparative ap-proach, examines the views of Malik Bennabi and Haydar Hobbollah in this regard. Bennabi's phenomenological approach, relying on psychological and historical analyses, presents an extra-religious image of the independence of the phenomenon of revelation and provides a rational ba-sis for defending its divine authenticity. In contrast, Hobbollah's analytical-critical approach, with careful attention to the implications and attributions of narrations, emphasizes the literal and spir-itual descent and, relying on intra-religious sources, provides a textual and narrative basis for this defense.Therefore, combining these two approaches can provide a comprehensive and multi-layered defense of the divine authenticity of Quranic revelation. This research shows how the capacities of narrative sources can be utilized alongside phenomenological analyses to defend the revelation of the Quran.