نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
Although the comparative approach to the hadith heritage in the interpretation of the Holy Quran has long been of interest to commentators, it is necessary to discuss and examine the foundations and challenges facing this interpretive method separately. This method attempts to achieve a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the verses by comparing different perspectives and narrations from Shiite and Sunni commentators. However, it has shortcomings and is capable of some interpretive deviations that can lead to superficial understandings, oversimplification, and ignoring the historical, linguistic, and cultural contexts of the narrations. Therefore, like other interpretive methods, it is necessary to clarify its precise boundary with false interpretations and interpretation by opinion. Among the most important problems of this method can be divided into fundamental issues such as nature, definitions, method, scope, and results. These shortcomings cause comparative interpretation to sometimes cause more ambiguity and disagreements instead of increasing accuracy. The present study, by comparatively examining the views of commentators and critiquing the foundations and methods of comparative-narrative interpretation, seeks to identify weaknesses and provide solutions to improve the quality of this approach.
کلیدواژهها English
