"Interpretive narrations, as invaluable treasures, play a fundamental role in understanding the profound knowledge of the Holy Quran. However, the diversity and multiplicity of these narrations, coupled with the possibility of weak or fabricated narrations, doubles the necessity of carefully investigating the validity of their sources and references. This research, aiming to provide a comprehensive and efficient model for evaluating the credibility of interpretive narrations, examines various dimensions of this issue and details the criteria for validating narrations. With an innovative approach, the present study, while analyzing and examining different aspects of the subject, addresses two main approaches in the field of validating narrations: examining the hierarchy of narrators and the content indicators of the narration. In this regard, evaluation criteria, analysis of various narrations, and presentation of practical solutions for validation are considered. The research findings indicate that the credibility of the source of interpretive narrations, in addition to the trustworthiness of the narrators, depends on other factors such as reliable evidence, the frequency of narration by prominent scholars, attention to the author's teachers and students, the content of the hadiths, access to manuscripts, the explicit statements of bibliographers, and the conformity of narrations with other authentic versions. Validating interpretive narrations, as one of the most fundamental needs of Islamic research, not only helps to resolve ambiguities and clarify complex issues but also strengthens the ethical and epistemological foundations of religious studies. By providing a documented answer to key questions in this field, this research paves the way for future research in the field of validating religious narrations and takes an effective step towards achieving a deeper understanding of the knowledge of the Holy Quran."